Title: II
Author: KULCSAR Agnes (ERCEA)
Company: European Commission

Corresponding PI's last name	Part B1	ACRONYM

ACRONYM

ERC Synergy Grant 2023
Research proposal [Part B1]

Instructions for completing Part B1 can be found in the ‘Information for Applicants to the Synergy Grant 2023 Call’.

(Part B1 is evaluated in Step 1, Step 2 and Step 3,
Part B2 is only evaluated in Step 2 and Step 3)

Proposal Full Title

PROPOSAL ACRONYM

Cover Page:
-	Name of the corresponding Principal Investigator (cPI) and corresponding Host Institution (cHI)
-	List the other PIs, indicating the Host Institution of each PI
-	Proposal duration in months

Please delete all text highlighted in grey in this template.

Proposal summary (identical to the abstract from the online proposal submission forms, section 1). 

The abstract (summary) should, at a glance, provide the reader with a clear understanding of the objectives of the research proposal and how they will be achieved. The abstract will be used as the short description of your research proposal in the evaluation process and in communications to contact in particular potential  independent external experts and/or to inform the Commission and/or the programme management committees and/or relevant national funding agencies (provided you give permission to do so where requested in the online proposal submission forms, section 1). It must therefore be short and precise and should not contain confidential information. 

Please use plain typed text, avoiding formulae and other special characters. The abstract must be written in English. There is a limit of 2000 characters (spaces and line breaks included).

Do NOT split the sections and/or references in Part B1 and do NOT upload them as separate documents. The peer reviewers will only receive one single document for evaluation at Step 1. Hence, Part B1 should contain all elements as explained in this template. If some parts of Part B1 are uploaded in the submission system as separate attachments, the peer reviewers will not have access to them. 

Section a: Extended Synopsis of the scientific proposal (max. 5 pages, references do not count towards the page limit)

[The Extended Synopsis should give a concise presentation of the scientific proposal, with particular attention to the ground-breaking nature of the research project, which will allow evaluation panels to assess, in Step 1 of the evaluation, the feasibility of the outlined scientific approach. Describe the proposed work in the context of the state of the art of the field. It is important that the extended synopsis contains minimum information relevant to the evaluation criteria, since the step 1 panel will have access only to part B1. 
References to literature should also be included. Please use a reference style that is commonly used in your discipline such as American Chemical Society (ACS) style, American Medical Association (AMA) style, Modern Language Association (MLA) style, etc. and that allows the evaluators to easily retrieve each reference. 

Please respect the following formatting constraints: Times New Roman, Arial or similar, at least font size 11, margin sizes (2.0 cm side and 1.5 cm top and bottom), single line spacing.] 

Section b: Curriculum vitae (max. 2 pages for each PI)

[Please follow the template below as closely as possible; it may be modified if necessary.]

PERSONAL INFORMATION
Family name, First name:
Researcher unique identifier(s) (such as ORCID, Research ID, etc. ...):
Date of birth: 
_Nationality: 
URL for web site: 		

•	EDUCATION

DD/MM/YYYY   PhD
	    Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution, Country
YYYY 	    Master
	    Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution, Country

•	CURRENT POSITION(S)

YYYY – YYYY  Current Position
		   Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	   Current Position
	   Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	PREVIOUS POSITION(S)

YYYY-YYYY	Position held 
	Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	Position held
	Name of Faculty/ Department, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS

YYYY-YYYY	 Name of Faculty/ Department/Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country 
YYYY 	Award received from Name of Institution/ Country 
YYYY-YYYY	Scholarship, Name of Faculty/ Department/Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	SUPERVISION OF GRADUATE STUDENTS AND POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWS (if applicable)

YYYY-YYYY	Number of Postdocs/ PhD/ Master Students
Name of Faculty/ Department/ Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	TEACHING ACTIVITIES (if applicable) 

YYYY-YYYY	Teaching position – Topic, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	Teaching position – Topic, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	ORGANISATION OF SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS (if applicable)

YYYY-YYYY	Please specify your role and the name of event / Country 
YYYY-YYYY	Please specify type of event / number of participants / Country

•	INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES (if applicable)

YYYY-YYYY	Faculty member, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	Graduate Student Advisor, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	Member of the Faculty Committee, Name of University/ Institution/ Country 
YYYY-YYYY	Organizer of the Internal Seminar, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY-YYYY	Member of a Committee; role, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	REVIEWING ACTIVITES (if applicable)

YYYY – 	Scientific Advisory Board, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Review Board, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Review panel member, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Editorial Board, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Scientific Advisory Board, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Reviewer, Name of University/ Institution/ Country 
YYYY –	Scientific Evaluation, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Evaluator, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	MEMBERSHIPS OF SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES (if applicable)

YYYY –	Member, Research Network “Name of Research Network”
YYYY –	Associated Member, Name of Faculty/ Department/Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country
YYYY –	Founding Member, Name of Faculty/ Department/Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country 

•	MAJOR COLLABORATIONS (if applicable)
Name of collaborators, Topic, Name of Faculty/ Department/Centre, Name of University/ Institution/ Country

•	CAREER BREAKS (if applicable) 
Exact dates	Please indicate the reason and the duration in months.

•	COVID-19 IMPACT TO SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY (if applicable)
Please specify which of the following situations apply to you:
•	Increased caring responsibility for dependent person, including home schooling of children;
•	No access to laboratory facilities, archives, or other necessary facilities;
•	No access to field work;
•	Adaptation to online teaching;
•	Physical and/or mental health issues;
•	Other(s) _________

(optional)
Explain with objective facts how your productivity was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a limit
of 300 characters, spaces and line breaks included.

Appendix
All ongoing grants and submitted grant applications of each of the PIs (Funding ID)
Mandatory information (not counted towards page limits)

Please include as many tables as participating Principal Investigators in the group.
Ongoing grants (Please indicate 'No funding' as applicable):

Project Title

Funding source

Amount
(Euros)

Period

Role of the PI

Relation to current 
ERC proposal

Describe clearly any scientific overlap between your ERC application and any ongoing grant or grant application.

Ongoing/submitted grant applications – still in evaluation at the time of this application (Please indicate 'None' as applicable):

Project Title

Funding source

Amount
(Euros)

Period

Role of the PI

Relation to current 
ERC proposa^3

Section c: Early achievement track-record / Ten years track-record (max. 2 pages for each PI)

Please list the order of authors as indicated in the original publication.

[Provide a list of achievements reflecting each Principal Investigator’s track record. 
You may include a short narrative description of the scientific importance of the research outputs of each Principal Investigator describing the role that the Principal Investigator played in their production.

(for more information see ‘Information for Applicants to the Synergy Grant 2023 Call’)]